No Contest vs. Guilty: Plea

No Contest and Guilty are both pleas made by the defendant in trial contrary to Nolle Prosequi which is made by the prosecutor. No contest vs. Guilty

No Contest and Guilty Plea are both pleas made by the defendant in a trial contrary to Nolle Prosequi which is made by the prosecutor.

 Essentially, both places shares some similarities but are different in terms of the consequence of each plea.

Pleading No Contest Meaning

Pleading No Contest is generally a plea made by a defendant in the court that he outrightly gives up the right to go to trial in exchange for the prosecutor agreeing to a much lesser offense than is available or recommend lesser punishment that is possible. 

According to the Longman Dictionary Of Contemporary English, No contest mean  to state that you will not offer a defence in a court of law for something wrong you have done.

The term Plead No Contest is represented with the Latin Maxim, "nolo contendere" meaning I do not wish to contest.

Meaning Of Guilty Plea

Pleading guilty simply means that the defendant admits committing the offense. 

No Contest vs. Guilty | Difference And Similarities

As stated earlier to plead no contest and guilty shares a similar features but are also different from each other.

Difference Between No Contest and Guilty Plea

Pleading guilty simply means that the defendant admits committing the offense. Contrary to this, no contest plea meaning is that the defendant does not admit the guilt of the offense he is charged with but accepts the conviction. 

Hence, the most glaring difference between no contest and guilty plea is the admission of guilt

Similarities Between No Contest And Guilty Plea

Both the plea no contest and guilty plea often considered the same thing and used interchangeably. Both plea requires discussion with the prosecution for a lesser offense.